World News – CA – Trump on Roe v annulment by Supreme Court Wade: ‘Nothing is happening there’

0
14

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten,
or redistributed © 2020 FOX News Network, LLC All rights reserved
Quotes displayed in real time or delayed by at least 15 minutes Market data provided by Factset Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Legal statement Mutual fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper

President Trump said Tuesday night that there was « nothing » going on at the Supreme Court with Roe v Wade, and it’s not on the ballot with the last vacancy on the Supreme Court

« Roe v Wading It’s also at stake right now, » Joe Biden said during the presidential debate, saying Judge Amy Coney Barrett should not be confirmed to fill the vacant seat after the judge’s death Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the election He said the abortion rights granted by Roe v Wade were « also on the ballot »

« Why is it on the ballot? » It’s not on the ballot, « Trump retorted. » Nothing’s going on there « 

On Sunday, Trump told Fox and Friends Weekend that if Barrett was confirmed by the Senate, it was « certainly possible » for the Conservative 6-3 majority to vote on a « life issue » «  » It certainly is possible And maybe they do it in a different way Maybe they would give it back to the states You just don’t know what’s going to happen « 

« She’s certainly conservative in her opinions, in her decisions, and we’ll have to see how it all works, but I think it will work, » the president said of his Supreme Court candidate

« It will happen automatically, in my opinion, because I put pro-life judges on the ground, » Trump said « I will say this: he will go back to the States, and the States will then make a decision »

In 2017, when Barrett was confirmed at the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Sen Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she assumed Barrett would vote ‘no’ on Roe v Wading

« I wouldn’t have a chance to vote against Roe, » Barrett replied. « And I would faithfully apply all Supreme Court precedents »

« It is never appropriate for a judge to impose the personal beliefs of that judge, whether based on faith or elsewhere, under the law, » she added. >

Barrett, while a professor of law at Notre Dame in 2016, was asked about ways in which a future Supreme Court could potentially allow states to further restrict abortion

« I don’t think the base case – Roe’s kernel arguing that, you know, women have the right to abortions – I don’t think that would change But I think the question of whether people can have very late abortions, how many restrictions can be placed on clinics – I think that would change, ”Barrett said during an appearance at the University of Jacksonville in Florida

Still, Democrats have sounded the alarm bells over Barrett’s nomination and how she might play into the abortion debate, especially noting her Catholic faith

« Barrett’s story of hostility to reproductive health and rights, expanding access to health care and more demonstrates that she will put the long record of judge Ginsburg in ensuring that everyone receives equal justice under the law, ”she said

Get all the stories you need from the most powerful name in the news, delivered early every morning to your inbox

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed © 2020 FOX News Network, LLC All rights reserved Quotes posted in real time or delayed by at least 15 minutes Market data provided by Factset Powered and powered by powered by FactSet Digital Solutions Legal statement Mutual fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper

Roe v Wade

World News – CA – Trump on Supreme Court Annulment of Roe v Wade: ‘Nothing’s going on there’


SOURCE: https://www.w24news.com

QU’EN PENSEZ-VOUS?

Donnez votre point de vue et aboonez-vous!

[gs-fb-comments]

[comment-form]

Votre point de vue compte, donnez votre avis

[maxbutton id= »1″]